Portfolio defense field guide
Turn inspectable artifacts into concise, honest competency proof.
One claim, one proof path
For each competency, link a problem, artifact, runnable command, result, failure evidence, and limitation. Prefer a fixed-test checksum and recompute command over a badge or proficiency percentage.
Case-study questions
- What production decision did the work support?
- Which constraints shaped the selection rule and architecture?
- What baseline and fixed test set made comparison fair?
- Where did the system fail, what is mitigated, and what remains uncertain?
- What is public, what is private, and how was sanitization verified?
Ninety-second defense
Open with the problem and constraint. Trace the hybrid signal path. Show one measured comparison, one failure card, the human-review boundary, and the exact reproduction route. Close with the honest claim and next experiment. Add captions and a transcript.
Release audit
Clone cleanly, follow the README, run tests/demo/recompute commands, inspect Git history and generated files for private residue, verify licenses/provenance, and open every evidence link. Optional external feedback may improve communication; it is not certification.
Your local study notes mount here when JavaScript is available.
Teaching modes mount here when JavaScript is available. The readable course remains available without them.